From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/57118 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus SPAM support, and email based reporting. Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 07:34:13 +0200 Organization: Probably a good idea Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <87zn93xnoq.fsf@dod.no> References: <87isfy7p6a.fsf@enki.rimspace.net> <1xmm1vhg.fsf@random.localnet.unwireduniverse.com> <4nzn95gwu7.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fzawgyxq.fsf@dod.no> <4npt9zj1x6.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1082698578 19608 80.91.224.253 (23 Apr 2004 05:36:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 05:36:18 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M5658@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Apr 23 07:36:09 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BGtM9-0003Cq-00 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 07:36:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1BGtKU-0002vv-00; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:34:26 -0500 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1BGtKP-0002vq-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:34:21 -0500 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BGtKN-0007jh-Gh for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:34:19 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52743A0208 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:34:17 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BGtKK-0006Am-00 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 07:34:16 +0200 Original-Received: from gw.computas.com ([193.71.42.4]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 07:34:16 +0200 Original-Received: from sb by gw.computas.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 07:34:16 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 24 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: gw.computas.com Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:wCXDZnUMBa/keqf7MgiMZITTu8A= Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:57118 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:57118 >>>>> Ted Zlatanov : > On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, sb@dod.no wrote: >> Note that there are two different ways of reporting the spam: >> - as resends >> - MIME attachments > We'll just add a digest and attachment version of the reporter: > (defun spam-report-resend-attachment (&rest articles) > ...) > (defun spam-report-resend-digest (&rest articles) > ...) That would make it three different ways. By "resend" I meant what happens when you do `S D r'. It's what I need for one of my addresses. The difference between resend attachment and resend digest is that with the latter, the message/rfc822 parts are wrapped inside a multipart/digest, and the first part should be skipped when unpacking. I don't know how significant this difference would be for the unpacking filter...?