Re: Fancy splitting getting headers from included text

[David Z Maze <dmaze@MIT.EDU>]

Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:

> David Z Maze <dmaze@MIT.EDU> writes:
>
>> Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:
>>
>>> I think it was reported to happen for nnmail too.  Hm.  Those who are
>>> seeing this, are you using spam.el and downloading bodies too?
>>
>> Using spam.el, yes.  Relevant parts of my .gnus file:
>
> And it isn't fixed in CVS?  I think a fix related to this went into
> spam.el recently.

Yup, still there with current CVS.  I even see the proposed
save-excursion in spam-split in spam.el.

(And I tried to follow it a little, and my brain hurt.  I'm not used
to elisp code having that sort of control flow.  (return) isn't in my
normal elisp vocabulary, particularly when it does something *other*
than return from the current function...it *does* look like the
save-excursion there should wrap the potential call to (widen),
though.  I have spam-use-stat set to t, so the code path that calls
(widen) does get taken.)

-- 
David Maze             dmaze@mit.edu          http://www.mit.edu/~dmaze/
"Theoretical politics is interesting.  Politicking should be illegal."
	-- Abra Mitchell