From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/46101 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: TMDA (was: new spam functionality added) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 23:38:27 +0200 Organization: Probably a good idea Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87znvroizw.fsf@doohan.bang.priv.no> References: <873ctztyth.fsf@mail.paradoxical.net> <20020801222925.A10502@mastaler.com> <02Aug5.143835edt.119445@gateway.intersystems.com> <02Aug5.174118edt.119294@gateway.intersystems.com> <874re5wvrc.fsf@home.lan> <877kj11ctx.fsf@naz.lickey.com> <87u1m5w14y.fsf@doohan.bang.priv.no> <87bs8bygij.fsf@naz.lickey.com> <87ofc9rdcv.fsf@doohan.bang.priv.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1029188338 26218 127.0.0.1 (12 Aug 2002 21:38:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 21:38:58 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17eMts-0006ol-00 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 23:38:57 +0200 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 17eMto-0006rf-00; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 16:38:52 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 12 Aug 2002 16:39:21 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA07496 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 16:39:04 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 4159 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2002 21:38:30 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 4154 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2002 21:38:29 -0000 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (80.91.224.244) by gnus.org with SMTP; 12 Aug 2002 21:38:29 -0000 Original-Received: from news by quimby.gnus.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17eNGj-0008Ul-00 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 00:02:33 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding Original-Lines: 11 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: b48sfn.cm.chello.no Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 1029189753 31514 213.46.211.96 (12 Aug 2002 22:02:33 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Aug 2002 22:02:33 GMT Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp, i386-debian-linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:UUTZ/Wu/pJs9I3EygbISKci1+AQ= Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46101 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46101 >>>>> prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc): > Think of it as validating a person, not an address. As long as the > person is validated, why do you care which address is used for the > validation? I want the address used when I do `r' to be a valid, working address. Mainly because I'm tired of editing "deletethis" or "ihatespam" out of the From addresses of bounced messages, before doing a resend (or not, as the case may be).