From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/63699 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daiki Ueno Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region? Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 07:44:16 +0900 Message-ID: <8fa58311-3574-41c5-a0ad-f40089ba8c40@well-done.deisui.org> References: <9c79059a-61a9-4fa4-8376-638753320a14@well-done.deisui.org> <4aaf7080-0e3d-4a75-aff5-f9d5bcd0437f@well-done.deisui.org> <87fyjz2gaj.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <87ac5gnccs.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <8fe569ef-0b5e-4c29-b434-686fce4c619b@well-done.deisui.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1157582764 30102 80.91.229.2 (6 Sep 2006 22:46:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 22:46:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: satyaki@chicory.stanford.edu, Reiner.Steib@gmx.de, ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, fw@deneb.enyo.de, jas@extundo.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 07 00:46:02 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GL69S-0006dc-VG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Sep 2006 00:45:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GL69S-0002K8-IQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:45:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GL68x-0001lU-Ex for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:45:15 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GL68u-0001f1-A3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:45:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GL68u-0001eK-0m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:45:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [221.255.76.220] (helo=localhost) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GL692-0001qL-6W; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:45:20 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=well-done.deisui.org ident=ueno) by localhost with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GL683-0003x1-P7; Thu, 07 Sep 2006 07:44:19 +0900 Original-To: rms@gnu.org X-Attribution: DU In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Wed, 06 Sep 2006 15:05:22 -0400") X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:59479 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:63699 Archived-At: >>>>> In >>>>> Richard Stallman wrote: > I don't think so. The rationale is, (1) decrypting large data takes > some time, (2) the user tends to interrupt Emacs from the terminal, and > What do you mean by "interrupt Emacs from the terminal"? > I don't understand the scenario that you have in mind here. ^C in the terminal where the user launched Emacs (without -nw.) In this case Emacs can't be said to be "killed" but it is enough to leave the tempfile on the filesystem after the Emacs process terminated. Regards, -- Daiki Ueno