From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/3815
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: mcampbel@schubert.sbi.com (Michael the Bearded)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: What's wrong with this?
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 1995 12:45:37 -0500
Organization: Salomon Bros. Inc
Message-ID: <9511021745.AA29457@schubert.sbi.com>
Reply-To: mcampbel@schubert.sbi.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035144644 27380 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:10:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:10:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-From-Line: ding-request@ifi.uio.no  Thu Nov  2 11:24:26 1995
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id LAA06854 for <steve@miranova.com>; Thu, 2 Nov 1995 11:24:24 -0800
Original-Received: from internet2.sbi.com (rutherford2.SBI.COM [192.195.121.10]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <SAA17100@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Thu, 2 Nov 1995 18:45:44 +0100
Original-Received: from internet.sbi.com (rutherford.SBI.COM [192.195.121.6]) by internet2.sbi.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id MAA17352 for <ding@ifi.uio.no>; Thu, 2 Nov 1995 12:45:28 -0500
Original-Received: from mhfl.sbi.com by internet.sbi.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA19109; Thu, 2 Nov 95 12:45:26 EST
Original-Received: from schubert.sbi.com by mhfl.sbi.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA23794; Thu, 2 Nov 95 12:45:40 EST
Original-Received: by schubert.sbi.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA29457; Thu, 2 Nov 1995 12:45:37 -0500
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-Attribution: MC
Original-Lines: 25
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:3815
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:3815


In my all.SCORE file, I have:

 ("newsgroups" 
  ("^newsgroups:.*," -1 nil r)
  ("^newsgroups:.*,.*," -2 nil r)
  ("^newsgroups:.*,.*,.*," -4 nil r)
  ("^newsgroups:.*,.*,.*,.*," -8 nil r)
  ("^newsgroups:.*,.*,.*,.*,.*," -16 nil r)
  ("^newsgroups:.*,.*,.*,.*,.*,.*," -32 nil r)
  ("^newsgroups:.*,.*,.*,.*,.*,.*,.*," -64 nil r)
  ("^newsgroups:.*,.*,.*,.*,.*,.*,.*,.*," -128 nil r)
  ("^newsgroups:.*,.*,.*,.*,.*,.*,.*,.*,.*," -256 nil r)
  ("^newsgroups:.*,.*,.*,.*,.*,.*,.*,.*,.*,.*," -512 nil r)
  ("^newsgroups:.*,.*,.*,.*,.*,.*,.*,.*,.*,.*,.*," -1000 nil r))

Other than the efficiency issue, what's wrong with it?  It never gets used for
some reason.

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Michael Campbell - mcampbel@offenbach.sbi.com :: I speak only for myself :: |
| Fools! I'll destroy them all!                                               |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| carpe diva -- sieze the diva                                                |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+