From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/3827 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: campo@sunthpi3.difi.unipi.it (Massimo Campostrini) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: numbered backups & version-control Date: Fri, 3 Nov 95 11:58:39 +0100 Message-ID: <9511031058.AA04463@sunthpi3.sunthpi> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035144655 27440 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:10:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:10:55 +0000 (UTC) X-From-Line: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Fri Nov 3 04:18:13 1995 Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id EAA09968 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 1995 04:18:00 -0800 Original-Received: from ipifidpt.difi.unipi.it (ipifidpt.difi.unipi.it [131.114.8.130]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 3 Nov 1995 11:59:09 +0100 Original-Received: from sunthpi1.difi.unipi.it by ipifidpt.difi.unipi.it (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03) id AA30008; Fri, 3 Nov 1995 11:54:13 +0100 Original-Received: from sunthpi3.sunthpi by sunthpi1.difi.unipi.it (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA12707; Fri, 3 Nov 95 11:57:35 +0100 Original-Received: by sunthpi3.sunthpi (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA04463; Fri, 3 Nov 95 11:58:39 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no Original-Lines: 16 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:3827 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:3827 I am a big fan of numbered backups (i.e. setting `version-control' to `t'). I find it very useful for files I am editing. But it is really too much for files generated automatically, such as `.newsrc.eld' and `.newsrc'. rmail mode solves this by never making numbered backups of mail files (by making `version-control' local to the buffer and setting it to `never'). I would like a similar behavior from gnus (maybe as an option, although I can't see anybody needing six old versions of `.newsrc.eld' backed up). It should be very easy to implement, probably I can implement it myself :-) Comments?