From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4171 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai Grossjohann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Signature in forwarded messages Date: Thu, 30 Nov 95 10:33:32 +0100 Message-ID: <9511300933.AA24332@dusty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de> References: <199511291831.KAA04524@block.statsci.com> <199511300635.WAA07790@cyclone.Stanford.EDU> <199511300742.CAA09761@ector.cs.purdue.edu> Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035144957 28731 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:15:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:15:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eagle@cyclone.Stanford.EDU Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id CAA19780 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 1995 02:25:11 -0800 Original-Received: from waldorf.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (waldorf.informatik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.42]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Thu, 30 Nov 1995 10:33:52 +0100 Original-Received: from dusty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de by waldorf.informatik.uni-dortmund.de with SMTP (Sendmail 8.6.11/UniDo 2.0.38) id KAA17476; Thu, 30 Nov 1995 10:33:33 +0100 Original-Received: by dusty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de id AA24332; Thu, 30 Nov 95 10:33:32 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Saileshwar Krishnamurthy's message of Thu, 30 Nov 1995 02:42:49 -0500 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4171 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4171 >>>>> On Thu, 30 Nov 1995 02:42:49 -0500, Saileshwar Krishnamurthy >>>>> said: Sailesh> Just something trivial: Gnus unlike GNUS displays the Name Sailesh> of the sender of a message rather than the email-address in Sailesh> a summary buffer. There are times when people don't have Sailesh> names, only email-addresses and then that entry in the Sailesh> Summary buffer is just blank. Yes! Yes! I get this, too, and have always attributed it to BBDB. If you don't use BBDB that might be an indication of a problem with Gnus rather than with BBDB or the BBDB/Gnus interaction. \kai{} -- Have you hugged your signature today?