From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4215 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Hendrickson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Resending (was Re: Signature in forwarded messages) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 1995 00:10:35 -0600 Organization: Computational Biology Centers, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Message-ID: <9512010610.AA16059@shadow> References: <199511291831.KAA04524@block.statsci.com> <199511301646.LAA07768@thuban.gsfc.nasa.gov> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035144993 28874 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:16:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:16:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id WAA31543 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 1995 22:53:32 -0800 Original-Received: from mhub2.tc.umn.edu (0@mhub2.tc.umn.edu [128.101.131.52]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 1 Dec 1995 07:10:49 +0100 Original-Received: from lenti.med.umn.edu by mhub2.tc.umn.edu; Fri, 1 Dec 95 00:09:17 -0600 Original-Received: from shadow (shadow.med.umn.edu) by lenti.med.umn.edu; Fri, 1 Dec 95 00:10:40 CST Original-Received: by shadow; Fri, 1 Dec 1995 00:10:35 -0600 Original-To: davidk@lysator.liu.se (David K}gedal) In-Reply-To: David K}gedal's message of 1-Dec-95 06:36:22 +0100 X-Mailer: 19.13 XEmacs Lucid with VM 5.95 (beta) and BBDB version 1.50; 18-feb-94. X-Geek: GAT d-() s++: a- C++$ US++++$ P++(---)$ L E+(---) W+++$ N+$>++ o+ K !w--- !O M+(-) !V-- PS+ PE Y+>++ PGP>+++ t+(++)@ !5 X+ R tv+ b+>+++ DI++++ D+ G e>++ h(+) r++ y+ [GeekCode 3.1] X-Nsa-Fodder: quiche Soviet Treasury Honduras X-Url: The Crystal Cave Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4215 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4215 supposedly David K}gedal spoke about "Re: Resending (was Re: Signature in forwarded messages),": > One other thing. At least one of the Resent-* headers should be > visible by default, (Resent-to and Resent-by should be there) as it > can get a bit confusing otherwise when you get a mail not adressed to > you. To me, that would defeat the purpose of ``resending'' a message. It should be transparent to the recipient that the message was resent, unless they examine the headers closely. Otherwise I used ``forward''. Just MHO, but I think this is how other MUA's work too... -- [Sir Stafford Cripps] has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire. -- Winston Churchill Eric D. Hendrickson Computational Biology Centers/Medical School Senior Analyst/Programmer University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, USA 612/625-3644 (phone) Crystal Cave 612/626-0623 (fax) Damnit! I can't stop the heterocyclic declination!