From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4368
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai Grossjohann <grossjoh@dusty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: gnus-cache redux
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 95 09:21:51 +0100
Message-ID: <9512130821.AA11051@dusty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <w8szqd5gnfg.fsf@gymir.ifi.uio.no>
Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann <grossjoh@charly.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145124 29352 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:18:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:18:44 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id BAA15560 for <steve@miranova.com>; Wed, 13 Dec 1995 01:03:00 -0800
Original-Received: from waldorf.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (waldorf.informatik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.42]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <JAA25494@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Wed, 13 Dec 1995 09:22:09 +0100
Original-Received: from dusty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de
	by waldorf.informatik.uni-dortmund.de with SMTP (Sendmail 8.6.11/UniDo 2.0.39)
        id JAA08917; Wed, 13 Dec 1995 09:21:52 +0100
Original-Received: by dusty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de id AA11051; Wed, 13 Dec 95 09:21:51 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 07 Dec 1995 11:48:03 +0100
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4368
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4368

>>>>> On 07 Dec 1995 11:48:03 +0100, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
<larsi@ifi.uio.no> said: 

  Lars> Or whatever.  Anyways, I've added an active file to
  Lars> gnus-cache, which means that Gnus startup with the cache won't
  Lars> be noticably slower than starting Gnus without the cache.

  Lars> While I'm revising gnus-cache, I wonder whether I should do
  Lars> more.  I'm not really satisfied with the method Gnus uses for
  Lars> entering/removing stuff from the cache -- it's all based on
  Lars> the article marks, and it feels a bit kludgy.  I'm also
  Lars> wondering how to fit that "persistent article" thingie into
  Lars> the scheme.

When I `*' an article to put it in the cache, will it always appear in
the group listing like a `!' article does, or won't it appear, like a
`?' article?  Or will this be configurable?  Or do we have two kinds
of `*', visible and invisible ones?

        \kai{}
--
Sometimes you lose; sometimes you just don't win.