From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4431 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason L Tibbitts III Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Switching to Adaptive Scoring Date: Thu, 14 Dec 1995 19:05:03 -0600 Message-ID: <9512150105.AA19656@hpc.uh.edu> References: <9302.818978808@dg-rtp.dg.com> Reply-To: Jason L Tibbitts III NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145176 29550 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:19:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:19:36 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from moonbase_v.moonvalley.com (moonbase_v.moonvalley.com [204.212.162.1]) by miranova.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id RAA30013 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 1995 17:42:38 -0800 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by moonbase_v.moonvalley.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id RAA14104 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 1995 17:30:16 -0800 Original-Received: from Post-Office.UH.EDU (Post-Office.UH.EDU [129.7.1.20]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 02:05:17 +0100 Original-Received: from hpc.uh.edu (Sina.HPC.UH.EDU) by Post-Office.UH.EDU (PMDF V5.0-5 #8380) id <01HYT3UZ5G8Q0009M4@Post-Office.UH.EDU> for ding@ifi.uio.no; Thu, 14 Dec 1995 19:05:06 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (localhost) by hpc.uh.edu (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA19656; Thu, 14 Dec 1995 19:05:04 -0600 In-reply-to: labrown@dg-rtp.dg.com's message of Thu, 14 Dec 1995 17:06:48 -0500 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4431 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4431 >>>>> "LAB" == Lance A Brown writes: LAB> I've been using Gnus 5 since about (ding) version 0.30 and am LAB> considering switching to adaptive scoring. What is the best way to do LAB> this given that I have a large number of *.SCORE files with various LAB> tweaks in them. You can just turn it on. All adaptive scoring info by default goes into *.ADAPT files. Any adjustments made in your SCORE files still work. LAB> I'm also interested in seeing some examples of adaptive scoring setups LAB> that work well for people. I've tweaked this quite a bit over the last ten months or so. At one point it may have been made the default. The idea is that you use "d" if you don't like the author and "k" if you don't like the subject. You might want to adjust the bonuses and penalties if you read on average a different percentage of the articles in a group (I average about 2/5) or if you find author more important than subject. (setq gnus-default-adaptive-score-alist '((gnus-kill-file-mark) (gnus-unread-mark) (gnus-read-mark (from 3) (subject 30)) (gnus-catchup-mark (subject -10)) (gnus-killed-mark (from -1) (subject -20)) (gnus-expirable-mark (from -2) (subject -15)) (gnus-del-mark (from -2) (subject -15)) )