From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4880 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: craffert@sps.ml.com (Colin Rafferty) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gnus-reparent.el Date: Wed, 24 Jan 96 10:11:29 EST Message-ID: <9601241511.AA09643@sparc10.sps.ml.com> References: Reply-To: Colin Rafferty NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145565 31170 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:26:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:26:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: (ding) GNUS Mailing List Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id IAA04841 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 08:17:31 -0800 Original-Received: from mlfire.ml.com (mlfire.ml.com [192.246.100.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 16:12:54 +0100 Original-Received: from commpost.ml.com ([146.125.4.24]) by mlfire.ml.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA09704; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 10:13:06 -0500 Original-Received: from sparc10.sps.ml.com ([192.168.111.24]) by commpost.ml.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA18808; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 10:12:56 -0500 Original-Received: from spssunp.masdev.ml.com by sparc10.sps.ml.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA09643; Wed, 24 Jan 96 10:11:29 EST Original-Received: by spssunp.masdev.ml.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA14163; Wed, 24 Jan 96 10:11:14 EST Original-To: Kai Grossjohann In-Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann's message of 24 Jan 1996 14:50:42 +0100 X-Face: ""xJff%{>hr-{:QXl"Xk2O@@(+F]e{"%EYQiW@mUuvEsL>=mx96j12qW[%m;|:B^n{J8k?Mz[K1_+H;$v,nYx^1o_=4M,L+]FIU~[[`-w~~xsy-BX,?tAF_.8u&0y*@aCv;a}Y'{w@#*@iwAl?oZpvvv X-Y-Zippy: I own seven-eighths of all the artists in downtown Burbank! Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4880 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4880 In private email, Kai Grossjohann writes: > Dear Colin, > do you still use gnus-reparent? I currently use sgnus-0.30 and it > doesn't seem to work anymore. I don't use reparent often but > sometimes it would come in really handy. My contribution to Gnus, gnus-summary-reparent-thread has been included in sgnus-0.30. You can get rid of my version, and just use the included one (T ^). > gnus-reparent references a function gnus-get-header-by-num which > doesn't exist (anymore?). The only change is that `gnus-get-header-by-num' has been replaced by `gnus-summary-article-header'. ; Colin