From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/5425 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marc Horowitz Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: sgnus question/suggestion Date: Sun, 03 Mar 1996 15:27:21 EST Message-ID: <9603032027.AA15104@bart-savagewood.MIT.EDU> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146030 32755 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:33:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA07840 for ; Sun, 3 Mar 1996 12:52:46 -0800 Original-Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.72.1.2]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Sun, 3 Mar 1996 21:27:28 +0100 Original-Received: from BART-SAVAGEWOOD.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP id AA18771; Sun, 3 Mar 96 15:26:50 EST Original-Received: by bart-savagewood.MIT.EDU (5.0/4.7) id AA15104; Sun, 3 Mar 1996 15:27:22 -0500 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5425 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5425 I use dgnus, not sgnus, but this seems to be relevant to both, and sgnus is more likely to be changed. Why is MIME handled specially in gnus-article-prepare? It would seem to be more straightforward to handle MIME as a gnus-article-prepare-hook, or gnus-article-display-hook. If there is no good reason not to do this, then I suggest it be done :-) Marc P.S. I'm not on the list, so I'll need to be cc'd to see any discussion.