From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/72778 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Riley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: splitting working now : some issues/questions Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 16:46:54 +0200 Organization: aich tea tea pea dicky riley dot net Message-ID: <9i4ocwyc69.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286549233 27094 80.91.229.12 (8 Oct 2010 14:47:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 14:47:13 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M21150@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Oct 08 16:47:12 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P4EE2-0003Jc-W2 for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 16:47:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P4EDx-0005eu-8d; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:47:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P4EDv-0005ec-KN for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:47:03 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P4EDr-0000eO-EZ for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:47:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1P4EDq-0006VO-00 for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 16:46:58 +0200 Original-Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so1035217bwz.17 for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 07:46:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:organization :references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-type; bh=QgWI0/3JeLhFLEuD+/eROv6QsrYRrFd2Qgy+amNVJ3k=; b=Vitw2abx3yIYBgVEyxbN301u++IhTJ+9tkfS2WDlpF9mPIYP06SpNAp7g/pek+Uf+7 dasPIsnb6HcVboEY9HkzuDiekiFIYDb+qs6i6+/yjYWDTHJoAdS41vCZeeHPRiPiTD4A 2e/qo//XqQ1A5xdzLMmaHErfICF/DNyfg5lis= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:organization:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=VA4c3IpPqslScZy2FzN82R8QCnOTFwbbPniNhTTVf/Smk1R5ZaDopRiw+K1iSiUv7s Nh2GQHzdM2NAr8G6YA12SwzQhtB/zDWD3/ibwtUzjV8VFkkmEow7/9w9F0MJYs3zQzg6 PAjX9BMOmLxMAxX4QllkOzM46ZRDf/SqeHmHA= Original-Received: by 10.204.82.130 with SMTP id b2mr2155171bkl.12.1286549218239; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 07:46:58 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([85.183.18.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y19sm2724110bkw.18.2010.10.08.07.46.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 08 Oct 2010 07:46:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 07 Oct 2010 22:02:23 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:72778 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Richard Riley writes: > >> But the bottom line is that it now works. I *think* something has >> changed with regard to it always processing all messages in the INBOX - >> it didnt do it before for me but I am happy enough with the stop gap >> measure of placing all processed mails into "mail" for the time being >> where it is not processed further. > > Yes, nnimap goes through all the mail in the INBOX now -- even the stuff > it's seen before. I'm not sure whether this is a feature or a bug... Its nice in that when reading inbox mails in other clients such as k9 on a mobile then gnus will still split it. Its not so nice in that its new behaviour and many people will have thousands of emails in their INBOX (and why I spent hours scratching my head wondering why it kept hiding all my mail ;) If possible I think it should have a setting and default to the old behaviour.