From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/27245 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Broken References (was: Cups) Date: 25 Nov 1999 21:09:44 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <9t93dtufi47.fsf@mraz.iskon.hr> References: <86903n762l.fsf@megalith.bp.aventail.com> <9t9wvr6fnub.fsf@mraz.iskon.hr> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035164304 23571 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:38:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:38:24 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA29109 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 1999 15:10:35 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAC13853; Thu, 25 Nov 1999 14:10:29 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 25 Nov 1999 14:10:22 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA00723 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 1999 14:10:12 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mraz.iskon.hr (root@mraz.iskon.hr [195.29.170.8]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA29104 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 1999 15:09:47 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost) by mraz.iskon.hr (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) id VAA21085; Thu, 25 Nov 1999 21:09:45 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h writes: > > Interoperability is sometimes _so_ sucky. > > I think the only servers with that problem were 1.4-vintage INN > servers. Yes. > At some point, Gnus should probably go back to wrapping as those > servers won't be around forever.... Except that wrapping doesn't preclude shortening. When speaking of header size limits, folded headers count as one line. Or doesn't it?