From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/27140 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: webmail, a mail source for HoTMaiL Date: 22 Nov 1999 11:23:20 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <9t93dty3jvr.fsf@mraz.iskon.hr> References: <2nhfiedfc3.fsf@tiger.jia.vnet> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035164220 23058 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:37:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:37:00 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from bart.math.uh.edu (bart.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.48]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA05900 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 05:25:18 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by bart.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAB15379; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 04:23:54 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 22 Nov 1999 04:24:02 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA09614 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 04:23:52 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mraz.iskon.hr (mail@mraz.iskon.hr [195.29.170.8]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA05883 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 05:23:24 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from hniksic by mraz.iskon.hr with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian)) id 11pqcy-0008Cm-00 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 11:23:20 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h writes: > Now gnus can grab mails from HoTMaiL. I've checked it into CVS (0.99). > > Usage: > (push '(webmail :wmtype hotmail :user "your_account" > :password "top_security") mail-sources) Just a nitpick design note: don't you think :wmtype keyword should be just :type? It is parsed in the context of `webmail' list, so there can be no namespace collision. Besides, it is not consistent with :user (:wmuser?) and :password.