From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/27524 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: "widening" a reply Date: 02 Dec 1999 09:17:56 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <9t97lix92ob.fsf@mraz.iskon.hr> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035164537 25039 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:42:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:42:17 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from bart.math.uh.edu (bart.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.48]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA13370 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 03:18:36 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by bart.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAB05089; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 02:18:28 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 02 Dec 1999 02:18:38 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA04318 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 02:18:26 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mraz.iskon.hr (root@mraz.iskon.hr [195.29.170.8]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA13364 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 03:18:01 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from hniksic@localhost) by mraz.iskon.hr (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) id JAA07289; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 09:17:56 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h writes: > Matt McClure writes: > > > In the summary buffer, I can do R to reply to the author, or F to do a > > wide reply to all recipients of the original article. Frequently, I > > want to do F, but I do R by mistake. > > > > Is there a way to widen the reply I'm composing? > > Nope. My personal solution is to just use `F' all the time. I almost > never want the `R'. But there's still need for the feature. For instance, in groups with `to-address', I press `F' and start composing. Then I realize that the original message was Cc'ed to people not on the list. At that moment I'd like to "widen" my reply, too. Something like `C-c C-t', but wide. I need this often and it would be awfully nice to have it. What do you think?