From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/26392 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: New groups placing Date: 08 Nov 1999 15:11:30 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <9t9r9i113al.fsf@mraz.iskon.hr> References: <7t1ogd6z3kn.fsf@fly.srk.fer.hr> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035163610 19155 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:26:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:26:50 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA02118 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 09:12:40 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAB29335; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 08:12:38 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 08 Nov 1999 08:12:24 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA10875 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 08:12:14 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mraz.iskon.hr (mail@mraz.iskon.hr [195.29.170.8]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA02109 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 09:11:42 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from hniksic by mraz.iskon.hr with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian)) id 11kpW6-0000Kc-00 for ; Mon, 08 Nov 1999 15:11:30 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h writes: > Jan Vroonhof writes: > > > Shouldn't it really create just one group and let each item appear as > > threads. > > That would require doing something new and complex. > > For instance, how would it keep track of which comments you've read, > and tick marks? Uh? Like, the same way it's done for NNTP (.newsrc.eld)? What am I missing? > Doing it in the traditional Gnus framework means that all those > newsreaderly things Just Work like they should. Creating new groups out of the blue doesn't look very newsreaderly to me. Easier to implement it may well be, but to me it seems very weird.