From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/26507 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [OT] broken-reply-to Date: 09 Nov 1999 17:02:40 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <9t9u2mvvejj.fsf@mraz.iskon.hr> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035163703 19771 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:28:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:28:23 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA18529 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 11:03:12 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAB31492; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 10:03:10 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 09 Nov 1999 10:03:27 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA29826 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 10:03:15 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mraz.iskon.hr (mail@mraz.iskon.hr [195.29.170.8]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA18497 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 11:02:45 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from hniksic by mraz.iskon.hr with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian)) id 11lDjE-00022o-00 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 17:02:40 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h writes: > Can anyone provide me with a pointer to the discussion of why > mailing-lists shouldn't put in Reply-To headers. The document at sums it up pretty well.