From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/37733
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Andreas Fuchs <asf@void.at>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: MML menu in message-mode is poorly named
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 10:17:31 +0200
Sender: asf@dahaIM.dyndns.org
Message-ID: <E15VqR9-0000g3-00@dahaIM.dyndns.org>
References: <vaf1ymtumem.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<rjsnf00y02.fsf@ssv2.dina.kvl.dk>
	<ilur8ui6y3v.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org>
	<m3ae16890o.fsf@fermat.mts.jhu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed ; boundary="==-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035173097 15370 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:04:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:04:57 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <asf@void.at>
Return-Path: <asf@void.at>
Original-Received: (qmail 28462 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2001 08:18:03 -0000
Original-Received: from mail.ycn.com (212.88.160.3)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 12 Aug 2001 08:18:03 -0000
Original-Received: from dahaIM.dyndns.org (csvr3217.noe-online.at [194.106.234.217])
	by mail.ycn.com (8.11.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id f7C8Q7704410
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 10:26:07 +0200
Original-Received: from asf by dahaIM.dyndns.org with local (Exim 3.31 #1 (Debian))
	id 15VqR9-0000g3-00
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 10:17:31 +0200
Mail-Copies-To: never
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Attribution: asf
Original-Lines: 34
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37733
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37733

--==-=-=
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2001-08-11, Nevin Kapur <nevin@jhu.edu> wrote:
>> Is Jody's "Attach" or "Attachment" better?
> How about 'Parts' of 'Components'? They are more general than 'Attach'
> but less nerdy than MIME.

Hmm, my favorite would be `Multi-Part', but that might be too long for a
single menu entry.

'Components' is bad, IMHO, because this term is not very widely
used. Gnus might lose its GNKSA for not using standard terminology (-:

=2D-=20
Andreas Fuchs, <asf@acm.org>, asf@jabber.at, antifuchs

--=-=-=--

--==-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7djubucDAWATX9F8RAuiTAJ43/AwkNZZTZFryJwnOrusjydT8/QCcClsP
ts0PQA6nXW+9LEVtxwHsjSo=
=O1cJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==-=-=--