From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/39960 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Samuel Padgett Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Is this a buglet.. nndrafts:draft renegades Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2001 19:16:03 -0500 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <20011102214600.0ED71BD48@squeaker.lickey.com> <2nk7x7vr6n.fsf@zsh.cs.rochester.edu> <20011103193251.CBC04BD25@squeaker.lickey.com> <87ady3ef1u.fsf@squeaker.lickey.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035175586 30729 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:46:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:46:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 19196 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2001 00:16:50 -0000 Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu (mail@129.7.128.13) by mastaler.com with SMTP; 4 Nov 2001 00:16:50 -0000 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 160AxU-0003wE-00; Sat, 03 Nov 2001 18:16:16 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 03 Nov 2001 18:15:56 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA05141 for ; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 18:15:43 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 19185 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2001 00:15:58 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 19180 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2001 00:15:58 -0000 Original-Received: from rdu57-93-147.nc.rr.com (HELO harpo.homeip.net) (66.57.93.147) by gnus.org with SMTP; 4 Nov 2001 00:15:58 -0000 Original-Received: from sam by harpo.homeip.net with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 160AxH-0002ls-00; Sat, 03 Nov 2001 19:16:03 -0500 Original-To: Harry Putnam In-Reply-To: (Harry Putnam's message of "Sat, 03 Nov 2001 15:47:18 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mail-Followup-To: reader@newsguy.com, ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 27 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:39960 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:39960 Harry Putnam writes: >> But we aren't talking about C-x k. We're talking about C-c C-k, >> right? > > I was talking about C-x k Oh, sorry. > I'd kind of forgotten about C-c C-k. That does kill the Drafts/copy > here. Hm. If I compose a message from the *Group* buffer using "m" and then type "C-c C-k" midway through, it is put in my drafts folder. Is this not what you see? > I guess that is what I should be using. I still think C-x k should > do it to... to be consisitent. This would be _inconsistent_ with the way C-x k works in the rest of Emacs. I only think the message should not go to the drafts folder after C-x k if it's unmodified and hasn't been saved. After all, isn't this what C-c C-k is for: to cancel the message without making it a draft? And if this is not what C-c C-k is for, why have both C-c C-k and C-c C-d? Sam