Today, Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
>> WIBNI the functions complement each other, so that one can both
>> encrypt and sign a message? Making mml-secure-message behave more
>> like mml-secure-part would do the trick, I think.
> 
> Maybe a new "signencrypt" (or encryptsign? :-)) mode would do it?

Yup, that might work. Yet I think that keeping consistent with
mml-secure-part would be preferable, UI-wise. But if you have to, I'd
give my vote to signencrypt (because that's what it does: sign the
message, then encrypt it, IIRC).

-- 
Andreas Fuchs, <asf@acm.org>, asf@jabber.at, antifuchs