From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: interactive-p
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 22:14:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1CS5QB-00083T-Ee@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3oei67gwv.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> (message from Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen on Wed, 10 Nov 2004 00:15:44 +0100)
I'm not quite sure what counts as bad uses. Functions that change
their behavior surprisingly based on whether they're called
interactively or not?
Please look at the latest commands.texi; it explains what is good
and bad usage of interactive-p. I updated it a week ago.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-11 3:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E1COWYP-0001lW-Tc@fencepost.gnu.org>
2004-11-09 23:15 ` interactive-p Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2004-11-09 23:33 ` interactive-p Simon Josefsson
2004-11-11 3:14 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2004-11-11 4:00 ` interactive-p Katsumi Yamaoka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1CS5QB-00083T-Ee@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).