From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/59097 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: interactive-p Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 22:14:51 -0500 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1100143025 21105 80.91.229.6 (11 Nov 2004 03:17:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 03:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M7640@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Nov 11 04:16:54 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13] ident=mail) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CS5S9-00015J-00 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 04:16:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1CS5Qs-0007tO-00; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:15:34 -0600 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1CS5Qk-0007tG-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:15:26 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CS5Qh-0006f3-HY for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:15:23 -0600 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [199.232.76.164]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7960E3A01EF; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:15:22 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CS5QB-00083T-Ee; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 22:14:51 -0500 Original-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen In-reply-to: (message from Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen on Wed, 10 Nov 2004 00:15:44 +0100) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:59097 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:59097 I'm not quite sure what counts as bad uses. Functions that change their behavior surprisingly based on whether they're called interactively or not? Please look at the latest commands.texi; it explains what is good and bad usage of interactive-p. I updated it a week ago.