From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/63635 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region? (was: pgg-gpg-process-region) Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2006 11:16:30 -0400 Message-ID: References: <9c79059a-61a9-4fa4-8376-638753320a14@well-done.deisui.org> <4aaf7080-0e3d-4a75-aff5-f9d5bcd0437f@well-done.deisui.org> <87fyjz2gaj.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1157296630 3983 80.91.229.2 (3 Sep 2006 15:17:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 15:17:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jas@extundo.com, ueno@unixuser.org, satyaki@chicory.stanford.edu, ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 03 17:17:08 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GJtid-0007yl-7J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2006 17:17:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GJtic-0005Mo-Ko for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2006 11:17:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GJti6-00056S-64 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2006 11:16:34 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GJti5-000568-NE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2006 11:16:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GJti5-000563-JC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2006 11:16:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GJtsP-0007An-Iq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2006 11:27:13 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1GJti2-0003TL-26; Sun, 03 Sep 2006 11:16:30 -0400 Original-To: Reiner Steib In-reply-to: (message from Reiner Steib on Sat, 02 Sep 2006 13:16:05 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:59278 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:63635 Archived-At: In current Emacs CVS in fact `call-process-region' uses temp files. Bad. I think this is a severe security problem, isn't it? As far as I know, this not bad at all. Would you please explain why you think it is a problem?