From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/63653 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region? Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 13:18:03 -0400 Message-ID: References: <9c79059a-61a9-4fa4-8376-638753320a14@well-done.deisui.org> <4aaf7080-0e3d-4a75-aff5-f9d5bcd0437f@well-done.deisui.org> <87fyjz2gaj.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <8980fd83-08b6-4aef-97f2-a659cd2eadb2@well-done.deisui.org> <180dcf90-af71-4f6d-b0d0-57d364218c73@broken.deisui.org> <6d43cc51-e472-405c-b372-dba7ef5a914d@broken.deisui.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1157390376 7979 80.91.229.2 (4 Sep 2006 17:19:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:19:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org, Reiner.Steib@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 04 19:19:36 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GKI6e-0001ZW-Oq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 19:19:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GKI6e-0001xm-7c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 13:19:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GKI5F-0001IE-TZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 13:18:05 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GKI5F-0001Hx-IW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 13:18:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GKI5F-0001Hr-84 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 13:18:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GKIFo-0007X5-2Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 13:29:00 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1GKI5D-00005c-8Y; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 13:18:03 -0400 Original-To: Daiki Ueno In-reply-to: <6d43cc51-e472-405c-b372-dba7ef5a914d@broken.deisui.org> (message from Daiki Ueno on Mon, 04 Sep 2006 10:36:15 +0900) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:59324 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:63653 Archived-At: Yes it does. To solve them we should revert a couple of changes from Satyaki Das http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/49947 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/50457 I'm sure your right that these changes caused a problem. I am sure there was also a motive for the changes. Do you know what it was? If the changes solved some problems, does reverting the changes bring those problems back? If so, how should we solve them?