From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/65718 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gnus/assistant.el Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 18:31:32 -0500 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1195342364 15152 80.91.229.12 (17 Nov 2007 23:32:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 23:32:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Reiner Steib Original-X-From: ding-owner+M14214@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Nov 18 00:32:49 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ItX9d-000070-Gj for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 00:32:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1ItX8Y-0001Kg-KO; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:31:42 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1ItX8V-0001KQ-VU for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:31:39 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1ItX8Q-0005Ea-8m for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:31:39 -0600 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ItX8M-0002H1-00; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 00:31:30 +0100 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ItX8O-0007vQ-3m; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 18:31:32 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Reiner Steib on Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:50:37 +0100) X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:65718 gmane.emacs.devel:83485 Archived-At: I don't say it's wrong to remove the file. But I was hoping that it attracts more developers if it was installed somewhere in Emacs along with a TODO entry. That might perhaps happen, I don't think it is a good idea to install not-yet-working packages in Emacs.