From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/67676 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gnus should accept UTF8 even if UTF-8 is standard Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:36:10 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87iqruvs19.fsf@jidanni.org> <86od1mj3z2.fsf@lifelogs.com> <86od1lg3xq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87d4i1iqpq.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> <86k5c9fzm9.fsf@lifelogs.com> <878wsph5xr.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> <87wsg345oo.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> <86wsg2546l.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1224873552 21118 80.91.229.12 (24 Oct 2008 18:39:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:39:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tzz@lifelogs.com, ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 24 20:40:13 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KtRa1-0007E3-1x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:40:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44434 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KtRYv-0006DJ-Fd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:39:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KtRYq-0006Cx-OT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:39:00 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KtRYp-0006Ce-BU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:39:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36534 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KtRYp-0006Cb-6r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:38:59 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:51973) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KtRYo-00084F-W2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:38:59 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KtRW6-0002EF-PS; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:36:10 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Kenichi Handa on Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:54:51 +0900) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:104956 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:67676 Archived-At: For user's convenience, we currently have two choices; adding alias "utf8", or improving coding-system completion (as proposed by "Stephen J. Turnbull" ). To decide which way is better, whether "utf8" is an authorized name or not can be a good guide. If it's an authorized name, adding alias is good, if not, solving by more intelligent completion is good. I think there is a third option: recognize the name thru a list of second-class aliases.