From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/67681 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gnus should accept UTF8 even if UTF-8 is standard Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 00:10:29 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87iqruvs19.fsf@jidanni.org> <86od1mj3z2.fsf@lifelogs.com> <86od1lg3xq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87d4i1iqpq.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> <86k5c9fzm9.fsf@lifelogs.com> <878wsph5xr.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> <87wsg345oo.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> <86wsg2546l.fsf@lifelogs.com> <86abct3o4s.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1224994415 21567 80.91.229.12 (26 Oct 2008 04:13:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 04:13:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tzz@lifelogs.com, ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 26 05:14:36 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ktx1Q-0000O0-5I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 05:14:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56387 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ktx0K-0006CZ-4l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 00:13:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ktx0D-0006CN-1u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 00:13:21 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ktx0A-0006CB-9A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 00:13:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33497 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ktx0A-0006C8-6C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 00:13:18 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:38333) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ktx0A-0002wY-CY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 00:13:18 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KtwxR-0006sp-Ar; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 00:10:29 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:27:57 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:105010 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:67681 Archived-At: > For instance, completing-read could accept a list of alternatives > that are valid if entered, but should not affect completion. It's just easier to do a "loose match" than to hardcode a list of alternatives. If it works, it's fine.