From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/80954
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general,gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Bidi (R2L) in Gnus summary buffer (was: summary shows R2L)
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 03:41:48 -0500
Message-ID: <E1RqKtw-0002NW-2z@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <b4m62fzp8yv.fsf@jpl.org> <87k44ej53y.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327567322 14261 80.91.229.12 (26 Jan 2012 08:42:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:42:02 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Reiner Steib <Reiner.Steib@gmx.de>
Original-X-From: ding-owner+M29236@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Jan 26 09:41:58 2012
Return-path: <ding-owner+M29236@lists.math.uh.edu>
Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org
Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M29236@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1RqKu5-0007gh-Vu
	for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:41:58 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu)
	by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M29236@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1RqKu1-0003Dq-K4; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 02:41:53 -0600
Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33])
	by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1RqKu0-0003Di-KM
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 02:41:52 -0600
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51])
	by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1RqKtz-0002Fv-JH
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 02:41:52 -0600
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10] ident=Debian-exim)
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1RqKtx-0007GG-Rw
	for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:41:50 +0100
Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1RqKtw-0002NW-2z; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 03:41:48 -0500
In-reply-to: <87k44ej53y.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> (message from Reiner
	Steib on Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:27:29 +0100)
X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----)
List-ID: <ding.gnus.org>
Precedence: bulk
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:80954 gmane.emacs.devel:147937
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/80954>

> From: Reiner Steib <reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc>
> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:27:29 +0100
> Reply-To: Reiner Steib <Reiner.Steib@gmx.de>
> 
> On Thu, Jan 26 2012, السّلام عليكم wrote:
> [ Suggestions for Bidi (R2L) in Gnus summary buffer ]
> > I think it worth making Gnus do it by default.  WDYT?

Summary buffers should definitely have left-to-right paragraph
direction by default.  I said it long ago, several times AFAIR.  It
should definitely be done before 24.1 is released.  Now is a good
time, IMO.

> Please disuss this on emacs-devel. See also the long thread around
> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/142460/focus=143398>.

That thread is about something different: it's about how to avoid a
jumble caused by reordering of the _fields_ in the summary lines.