Re: Strange problems with 'format=flowed' in Content-Type header

[Florian Kruse <flokru@flokru.gnuu.de>]

Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> writes:

> Florian Kruse <flokru@flokru.gnuu.de> writes:
>>> I think we need the original article to be able to say anything much.
>> OK, here it is:
> Thanks, I noticed two problems and they turned out to be the same:
[...]
> Could you see if CVS Gnus work better for you?

Yes, it does. Thank you. This is a great improvement.

There are still some empty lines which are not supposed to be there. You
said something about fill-flowed but I don't understand exactly what
you mean with it.

Is it right that fill-flowed fills flowed articles using the fill-region
of GNU Emacs or XEmacs (which inserts my annoying empty lines)? So you
suggested to implement the filling in fill-flowed itself rather than
using fill-region?

However, it seems that there is still another problem:

In the article there is another part which looks like this with
format=flowed:

,--------
| > Footnotes: [1] fup2 poster - 'Followup-To: poster': Antworten auf
| > einen solchen
| 
| >                                           Artikel gehen per Mail an den
| >                                           Autor, aber nicht in die NG.
`--------

Without format=flowed it looks like 

,--------
| > Footnotes: 
| > [1]  fup2 poster - 'Followup-To: poster': Antworten auf einen solchen
| >                                           Artikel gehen per Mail an den
| >                                           Autor, aber nicht in die NG.
`--------

and I think that this is how it was supposed to look.

FloKru

-- 
Zu dieser Signature: http://www.detebe.org/3.14/ILOVEYOU-Signature-FAQ.html
begin  LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.txt.vbs
I am a signature virus. Distribute me until the bitter
end