From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/17718 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hallvard B Furuseth Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Making notes in a newsgroup Date: 11 Oct 1998 05:43:09 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035156369 2390 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:26:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:26:09 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA13115 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 1998 23:44:06 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAF21498; Sat, 10 Oct 1998 22:14:52 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 10 Oct 1998 22:43:49 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA03834 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 1998 22:43:42 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from pat.uio.no (6089@pat.uio.no [129.240.130.16]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA13105 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 1998 23:43:33 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from bombur2.uio.no (actually bombur2.uio.no [129.240.200.72]) by pat.uio.no with SMTP (PP); Sun, 11 Oct 1998 05:43:14 +0200 Original-Received: by bombur2.uio.no ; Sun, 11 Oct 1998 05:43:13 +0200 (MET DST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 10 Oct 1998 23:23:24 GMT" Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:17718 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:17718 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: >> "Lars - there is a bug in gnus: If I cache e.g. an nnml article and then >> edit the article, the cache copy is not updated." > > Hm. That's supposed to happen, from what I can glean from the code. > (`gnus-article-edit-exit'). Do the cached articles never get updated > on `C-c C-c' from the edited article buffer? Checking... Ah! The cache file is rewritten - but with the original contents. Happens both in gnus 5.6.44 and pgnus 0.34. Also, the `*' in front of an article in *Summary* disappears when I do `C-c C-c' after editing - even though the article is still cached, and the `*' comes back if I do gnus-summary-rescan-group. .gnus.el: (setq gnus-secondary-select-methods '((nnml "private"))) (setq gnus-use-cache 'passive) -- Hallvard