From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/21202 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hallvard B Furuseth Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Get \201 when I edit mail Date: 15 Feb 1999 03:26:48 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035159353 21802 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:15:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:15:53 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA19591 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 21:28:03 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAB13586; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 20:26:42 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 14 Feb 1999 20:27:50 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA18152 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 20:27:43 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from pat.uio.no (6089@pat.uio.no [129.240.130.16]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA19571 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 21:27:35 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from pat.uio.no (actually pat.uio.no [129.240.130.16]) by pat.uio.no with SMTP (PP); Mon, 15 Feb 1999 03:26:49 +0100 Original-Received: from bombur.uio.no ([129.240.186.42]) by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #1) id 10CDkG-0007Gn-00 for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 15 Feb 1999 03:26:48 +0100 Original-Received: by bombur.uio.no ; Mon, 15 Feb 1999 03:26:48 +0100 (MET) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Hallvard B Furuseth's message of "Mon, 15 Feb 1999 02:22:47 GMT" Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:21202 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:21202 I wrote: >> Gnus is in a different >> position from, well, everything else in Emacs in that the things that >> Gnus deals with have explicit information in the files themselves as >> to what character set they use, > > Only because rmail doesn't seem to handle Content-Type: ...charset=xxx. Er... I meant, that's why Gnus is different.