From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/22009 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hallvard B Furuseth Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: UIDL Date: 20 Mar 1999 21:44:17 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035160007 25875 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:26:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA12794 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 1999 15:46:40 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAB00982; Sat, 20 Mar 1999 14:45:36 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 20 Mar 1999 14:45:07 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA02690 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 1999 14:44:59 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mons.uio.no (6089@mons.uio.no [129.240.130.14]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA12740 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 1999 15:44:52 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mons.uio.no (actually mons.uio.no [129.240.130.14]) by mons.uio.no with SMTP (PP); Sat, 20 Mar 1999 21:44:18 +0100 Original-Received: from bombur.uio.no ([129.240.186.42]) by mons.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #1) id 10OSbS-0006JU-00 for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 20 Mar 1999 21:44:18 +0100 Original-Received: by bombur.uio.no ; Sat, 20 Mar 1999 21:44:17 +0100 (MET) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Colin Rafferty's message of "Thu, 18 Mar 1999 14:53:35 GMT" Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:22009 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:22009 Colin Rafferty writes: > I find it very handy, since one of my first split rules is this: > > ("x-uidl" ".+" junk) > > Do you ever get that header from a real mail message? A few recent messages from the IETF srvloc group to IETF-Announce had x-uidl, but that stopped -- I guess someone warned them that spam filters killed those messages. -- Hallvard