From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38773 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: IMAP vs nnml ? (was: Palm and Gnus) Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 16:48:00 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174583 24251 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:29:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:29:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 27760 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2001 14:48:12 -0000 Original-Received: from lie.extundo.com (195.42.214.244) by gnus.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2001 14:48:12 -0000 Original-Received: from localhost (jas@localhost) by lie.extundo.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f8FEm0X08730; Sat, 15 Sep 2001 16:48:00 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: lie.extundo.com: jas owned process doing -bs Original-To: Fabien Penso In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 9 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38773 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38773 On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Fabien Penso wrote: > By the way. Would I get better performance if I was using a local IMAP > server on my laptop rather than nnml groups ? I have about 16.000 mails > in my main mbox, I just wonder how to improve perf... Probably not. If your Gnus runs on the same laptop, IMAP would only add overhead.