From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/39118 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Continued header lines? Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 11:26:03 +0200 (CEST) Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174876 26145 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:34:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 8238 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2001 09:19:08 -0000 Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu (mail@129.7.128.13) by mastaler.com with SMTP; 3 Oct 2001 09:19:08 -0000 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 15oi9l-0004lu-00; Wed, 03 Oct 2001 04:17:33 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 03 Oct 2001 04:17:09 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id EAA28753 for ; Wed, 3 Oct 2001 04:16:57 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 8220 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2001 09:17:15 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 8215 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2001 09:17:15 -0000 Original-Received: from lie.extundo.com (195.42.214.244) by gnus.org with SMTP; 3 Oct 2001 09:17:15 -0000 Original-Received: from localhost (jas@localhost) by lie.extundo.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f939Q3s12241; Wed, 3 Oct 2001 11:26:03 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: lie.extundo.com: jas owned process doing -bs Original-To: Jesper Harder In-Reply-To: Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:39118 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:39118 On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Jesper Harder wrote: > > e.g. padding continuation header lines with SPC. Using TAB instead > > seems to work. Maybe Gnus should do what most other mailers seem to > > do (use TAB, that is)? > > I think that would be wrong according to RFC 2822. If you fold > > Foo: bar baz > > as > > Foo: bar > baz > > Then you would get > > Foo: barbaz > > when unfolding the header, which isn't the same as the original. Argh, you are right. I guess I'll have to trust that the server vendor fixes the bug then...