From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/41423 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: X-Face and depth Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 16:36:42 +0100 (CET) Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035176819 6002 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 05:06:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 05:06:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 24955 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2002 15:37:24 -0000 Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu (mail@129.7.128.13) by mastaler.com with SMTP; 2 Jan 2002 15:37:24 -0000 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 16LnRv-0003Wc-00; Wed, 02 Jan 2002 09:37:03 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 02 Jan 2002 09:36:55 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA23533 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 09:36:45 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 24925 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2002 15:36:47 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 24920 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2002 15:36:47 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO slipsten.extundo.com) (195.42.214.241) by gnus.org with SMTP; 2 Jan 2002 15:36:47 -0000 Original-Received: from localhost (jas@localhost) by slipsten.extundo.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g02Fag413880; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 16:36:42 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: slipsten.extundo.com: jas owned process doing -bs Original-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:41423 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:41423 On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > However, I'm not sure this is a good idea. Do we want to encourage > people to add even more data to the headers? On the other hand, this > is 2002, and bandwidth and disk space is so much cheaper than it was > when X-Faces were dreamt up. On the third hand, why not define a new > format altogether? X-Gif-Face, or something. Or even referring to an > outside source via HTTP. Maybe it is time to write the Face: specification? Suggestion: Make it contain a list of URLs inside <>'s. Then you could have things such as: Face: Face: (together with a MIME part with Content-ID MyFace) Face: (possibly together with cache) Face: Etc.