From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/44513 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Are the latest Oort features better suited for FSF Emacs? Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 15:41:46 +0200 (CEST) Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020174198 13375 127.0.0.1 (30 Apr 2002 13:43:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 13:43:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 172XuY-0003Tc-00 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 15:43:18 +0200 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 172Xtc-0007lC-00; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 08:42:20 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 30 Apr 2002 08:42:32 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA01648 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 08:42:20 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 14630 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2002 13:42:02 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 14625 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2002 13:42:01 -0000 Original-Received: from 178.230.13.217.in-addr.dgcsystems.net (HELO yxa.extundo.com) (217.13.230.178) by gnus.org with SMTP; 30 Apr 2002 13:42:01 -0000 Original-Received: from yxa.extundo.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by yxa.extundo.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g3UDfkKg031590; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 15:41:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (jas@localhost) by yxa.extundo.com (8.12.2/8.12.1/Submit) with ESMTP id g3UDfk79031587; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 15:41:46 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: yxa.extundo.com: jas owned process doing -bs Original-To: Lloyd Zusman In-Reply-To: Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:44513 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:44513 On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Lloyd Zusman wrote: > I've been using Gnus with XEmacs for years, but I have the impression > that recent enhancements of Oort might be better suited for use within > FSF Emacs. > > Is this the case? If so, what recent Gnus features work better under > FSF Emacs? > > Or if this is not the case, what Gnus features work better under XEmacs? Perhaps it is only that Oort added support for things in Emacs that XEmacs has supported for a long time. Images and stuff. The manual says Picons only works for XEmacs. It also says XEmacs usually supports compface internally, Emacs only via external program. It also says that XEmacs Gnus has a logo and toolbar while Emacs doesn't. Other than that, I can't find much differences in the manual. Personally, I find unicode works better with Oort in Emacs than in XEmacs.