From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/20268 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Shutko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: MIME handling for common MS Windows attachments? Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 09:50:08 -0600 (CST) Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035158589 16852 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:03:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:03:09 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA03819 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 10:44:35 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAB07815; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 09:44:05 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 13 Jan 1999 09:44:13 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA29374 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 09:44:05 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from rescomp.wustl.edu (rescomp.wustl.edu [128.252.188.241]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA03801 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 10:43:55 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from localhost (ats@localhost) by rescomp.wustl.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA02585 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 09:50:08 -0600 (CST) X-Sender: ats@rescomp Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:20268 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:20268 On 13 Jan 1999, Russ Allbery wrote: > for most images. It's a good bit slower when it has to dither 24-bit, but > that's not the common case for a MIME viewer, surely. And the quality I don't think so... I can easily see people passing around jpegs from their scanner/digital camera. In fact, I tend to think more people will be passing around 24-bit images than 8-bit.