From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/43567
Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Prolem with attachments.
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 21:37:36 +0100
Message-ID: <a511jq$v47$1@quimby2.netfonds.no>
References: <vpqr8ngfqbl.fsf@ubaye.imag.fr> <krause.87zo24fptp.fsf@sdbk.de>
	<vpqeljgfpl2.fsf@ubaye.imag.fr>
	<ufit8sckba.fsf@westkapp.wb.lightwerk.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1014237626 31879 195.204.10.66 (20 Feb 2002 20:40:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 Feb 2002 20:40:26 GMT
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 16ddXN-0008I0-00; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 21:40:25 +0100
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 16ddVS-0008SW-00; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 14:38:26 -0600
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 20 Feb 2002 14:38:26 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA23867
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 14:38:15 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: (qmail 17423 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2002 20:38:09 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 17414 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2002 20:38:09 -0000
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 20 Feb 2002 20:38:09 -0000
Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien [129.217.19.67])
        by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de  with ESMTP id g1KKbfb04841
        for <ding@gnus.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 21:37:41 +0100 (MET)
Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80])
	by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id VAA01089; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 21:37:36 +0100 (MET)
Original-Received: by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 6104)
	id 68E863AFCB; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 21:37:36 +0100 (CET)
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <ufit8sckba.fsf@westkapp.wb.lightwerk.com> (Frank Tegtmeyer's
 message of "20 Feb 2002 15:14:01 +0100")
Original-Lines: 13
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2.50
 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:43567
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:43567

Frank Tegtmeyer <fte@lightwerk.com> writes:

> In todays environments I think it's better to use a single large
> message - not many receivers will be able to puzzle the file
> together. You were an excellent example :)

I tried that, too, but it also failed.  So it seems that you shouldn't
send large messages.  Instead, compress the attachment with bzip2 or
something.

kai
-- 
~/.signature is: umop 3p!sdn    (Frank Nobis)