From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/43722
Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail
From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Does Mail-Followup-To generation work?
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 15:54:13 -0500
Organization: What did you have in mind?  A short, blunt, human pyramid?
Message-ID: <a5oq5b$6uf$1@quimby2.netfonds.no>
References: <m3bse8s40l.fsf@fermat.mts.jhu.edu>
	<m33czkz2cm.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
	<m3vgcg5iw6.fsf_-_@fermat.mts.jhu.edu>
	<87664gp6c8.fsf@paradoxical.net> <m3pu2o5h0h.fsf@fermat.mts.jhu.edu>
	<vaf3czkt3xh.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1015016427 7119 195.204.10.66 (1 Mar 2002 21:00:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: 1 Mar 2002 21:00:27 GMT
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 16gu8g-0001qe-00; Fri, 01 Mar 2002 22:00:26 +0100
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 16gu2z-0002IB-00; Fri, 01 Mar 2002 14:54:33 -0600
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 01 Mar 2002 14:54:36 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA07978
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 14:54:25 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: (qmail 4560 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2002 20:54:17 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 4555 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2002 20:54:16 -0000
Original-Received: from multivac.student.cwru.edu (HELO multivac.cwru.edu) (qmailr@129.22.96.25)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2002 20:54:16 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 3072 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2002 20:54:37 -0000
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <vaf3czkt3xh.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> (Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's
 message of "Fri, 01 Mar 2002 21:43:06 +0100")
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org
Original-Lines: 21
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/20.7
 (i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:43722
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:43722

Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Gro=DFjohann) wrote:
> Nevin Kapur <nevin@jhu.edu> writes:
>> Or something in Gnus that could modify
>> message-subscribed-address-functions when Gnus is loaded?   I guess
>> one has to be careful about this, not overwriting a user configuration.
>
> The default value for message-subscribed-address-functions is nil, so
> something like the following during Gnus startup might help:
>
> (setq message-subscribed-address-functions
>       (or message-subscribed-address-functions
>           '(gnus-find-subscribed-addresses)))

If the user explicitly sets it to nil, Gnus shouldn't override that.
We could change the default to '(ignore), which the user wouldn't do,
and then Gnus could change it if it's set to '(ignore).  I suggested
this earlier, possibly for a different variable, but it doesn't seem
to be in use now, so maybe there was a reason for removing it.


paul