From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/43779
Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Expiration problem
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 12:32:13 +0100
Message-ID: <a64v88$cm5$1@quimby2.netfonds.no>
References: <uadtmruri.fsf@axis.com>
	<vafu1ru2hvf.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<uvgcaq8xa.fsf@axis.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1015414856 12997 195.204.10.66 (6 Mar 2002 11:40:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: 6 Mar 2002 11:40:56 GMT
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 16iZmx-0003NS-00; Wed, 06 Mar 2002 12:40:55 +0100
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 16iZfM-0001yP-00; Wed, 06 Mar 2002 05:33:04 -0600
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 06 Mar 2002 05:33:08 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id FAA03472
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 05:32:55 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: (qmail 21629 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2002 11:32:46 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 21624 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2002 11:32:46 -0000
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2002 11:32:46 -0000
Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien [129.217.19.67])
        by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de  with ESMTP id g26BWJb08056;
	Wed, 6 Mar 2002 12:32:19 +0100 (MET)
Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80])
	by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id MAA08142; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 12:32:13 +0100 (MET)
Original-Received: by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 6104)
	id C1CAE3B427; Wed,  6 Mar 2002 12:32:13 +0100 (CET)
Original-To: Niklas Morberg <niklas.morberg@axis.com>
In-Reply-To: <uvgcaq8xa.fsf@axis.com> (Niklas Morberg's message of "Wed, 06
 Mar 2002 11:37:05 +0100")
Original-Lines: 13
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2.50
 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:43779
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:43779

Niklas Morberg <niklas.morberg@axis.com> writes:

> No. I did try M-u however, which did not work. For a moment
> there I thought that clearing marks restored an article to
> its original state (whatever that is), but it does not
> affect caching status.

No, M-u removes read and unread marks, but "*" is neither a read nor
an unread mark.

kai
-- 
Silence is foo!