From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/76068 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Riley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: send from queue Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 01:52:42 +0100 Organization: aich tea tea pea dicky riley dot net Message-ID: References: <8739oie840.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <87mxmqotor.fsf@gnus.org> <82bp355c3p.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> <87lj28adfy.fsf@gnus.org> <4139ogsl7o.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> <87tygw63tw.fsf@gnus.org> <87lj2787qk.fsf@gnus.org> <87tygt295l.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296176341 20481 80.91.229.12 (28 Jan 2011 00:59:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:59:01 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M24419@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Jan 28 01:58:54 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Picft-0006EB-2j for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 01:58:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Picfd-0005F1-0X; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:58:37 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Picfb-0005Et-Tg for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:58:35 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PicfO-00044D-Cn for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:58:35 -0600 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PicfN-0006d0-8E for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 01:58:21 +0100 Original-Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so2960514bwz.17 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:58:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:date:organization :message-id:references:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=RotJ/B0oxhDyJN/9ElbS36zWLNoAUR4UF6a8OhMRWH8=; b=cUQI5AkD3WpgS+WWPT9tA/JOHS3XA/gqyMUg2N9O6PjmgyNFBPDCmUptaTCxgASQxU 2O78oSPZ+iXEsyMW+QfaM5UPhfKz2twMkGPhTU0c8JaGUWRcWgKTYJ4q3sedssQuUdBQ qwjC04EmAkNN6ygItlpqgITQ0y0XhQa33zrjU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:date:organization:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=xmLVPZ6dS8MyVqr8E3Yzjs9aOpR0C9REzJMhWYGFJcOjoXfX7QScaXyahXI4scsQkx S70pmPMllkHbgeJwtQqD5IwSyPmzseCpaUsIlblmRtM7LS95sVIlDp9+ZkcAA1BoZIzc lNUUtcwm6lu4gCuMVkXqF7RXdA/L/DfWhbZb4= Original-Received: by 10.204.57.197 with SMTP id d5mr1929540bkh.63.1296176300643; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:58:20 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([85.183.18.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b6sm8429554bkb.10.2011.01.27.16.58.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:58:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87tygt295l.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:56:22 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:76068 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Richard Riley writes: > >> Great. Works. Just one small, tiny bug/missing feature left before its >> perfect.. to display the group queue in the group buffer display if >> the queue goes from having 0 messages to 1. At the moment it wont >> appear until you hit g if the always display regexp doesnt include it. > > Yes, none of the queue-updating commands insert the queue group into the > group buffer -- they just update it if it's already there. Fixing this > is totally trivial (just remove two characters in the source code), but > I'm not sure having the queue group appear all the time would be the > right thing to do? Euhrmn. Why not? I'll delete the two characters... Not all the time. Only when it goes from 0 to 1 AND the queue is in the visible regexp. The 1 to many queued is already taken care of.