From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/49337 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Fuchs Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: a short introduction to Gnus vs. Spam with spam.el Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 22:56:43 +0000 (UTC) Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1042844395 324 80.91.224.249 (17 Jan 2003 22:59:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 22:59:55 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18ZfSq-0008WN-00 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 23:59:52 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18ZfRQ-0008AY-00; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:58:24 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:59:19 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA17395 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:59:08 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18ZfPn-0008JU-00 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 23:56:43 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: ding@hpc.uh.edu Original-Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18ZfPn-0008JK-00 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 23:56:43 +0100 Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Lines: 9 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org Mail-Copies-To: never X-Url: http://asf.void.at/ X-Attribution: asf X-Face: 3*3w/y?I6|`'CYW7F~m0]U1)L\|[x"?/V6^;s3FU#q|F'AL(3C?$eslHvAmR:KjT"&LZeqM 0wMS%HM` Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49337 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49337 Today, Derrell Lipman wrote: > - 'H' as a spam mark seems counter-intuitive when the opposite is Ham. > (I realize that 'S' isn't available, but this is worth some > consideration.) '$'? -- Andreas Fuchs, , asf@jabber.at, antifuchs