From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70777
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Riley <rileyrg@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: That newfangled IMAP thing...
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:24:07 +0200
Organization: aich tea tea pea dicky riley dot net
Message-ID: <b0k4mqdgeg.fsf@news.eternal-september.org>
References: <m3r5h9dmqt.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
	<m3iq2kw2he.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <87hbi3jasy.fsf@lifelogs.com>
	<yb0lj7bvzyz.fsf@dod.no> <m3bp879fwp.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
	<87pqwmsusz.fsf@news.realpath.org> <m3tylx5g2g.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
	<ufa39th9mv5.fsf@epithumia.math.uh.edu>
	<m3y6b9406n.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <smur5h12kzf.fsf@linuxpal.mit.edu>
	<m3sk1h3yts.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <8762yd6j4j.fsf@rimspace.net>
	<87eid0fsil.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87bp84y00w.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org>
	<m3k4msxp21.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <m3aanonqnv.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
	<874odv4ar3.fsf@rimspace.net> <m3vd6b85mp.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
	<m3lj77807s.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <87lj770y3d.fsf@dod.no>
	<m38w377xux.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284376695 25156 80.91.229.12 (13 Sep 2010 11:18:15 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:18:15 +0000 (UTC)
To: ding@gnus.org
Original-X-From: ding-owner+M19150@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Sep 13 13:18:13 2010
Return-path: <ding-owner+M19150@lists.math.uh.edu>
Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org
Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M19150@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1Ov734-0000Pv-Mc
	for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:18:11 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu)
	by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M19150@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1Ov72y-0003n1-HE; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 06:18:04 -0500
Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32])
	by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <postmaster@quimby.gnus.org>)
	id 1OuqHp-0007IL-2c
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:24:17 -0500
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51])
	by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <postmaster@quimby.gnus.org>)
	id 1OuqHk-0003EU-PL
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:24:16 -0500
Original-Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com ([209.85.215.172])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1OuqHj-0003Kl-00
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:24:11 +0200
Original-Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so3292270eyd.17
        for <ding@gnus.org>; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 10:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:organization
         :references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version
         :content-type;
        bh=+RWKoSTda52fCKlfgHczyGuXF3LU1PhYHXXMaqXy7Cw=;
        b=xN6uqitLZe3Ta+X1kmfPkm9BlpKic5L/pXOk2dvEDqjgTgZINQwznwAMjg0VJA6Apu
         WxNbmw70Gx9tArs49CdMh4JzVp95a5K/PHbCMm1Od+CUsMdeQSooDfW6pi15OaA21zgF
         98r3EheFTdVedLq+W8Li3Tn9moKZaOiFaczdg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=from:to:subject:organization:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id
         :user-agent:mime-version:content-type;
        b=sAEsAyRlmRKSAk74DSH31KqQOFAOmaVeZk5HC687bwJCAO/HTWTfe5z2+16y8dSi/J
         Khlqh8fTVjTZwVVbr6blKVRwMCqCqV60FWRaD0TwYcZ2h3b4yQelSFO3he1lNleEsdUR
         lrE5NQL1Dz0n06WyEUoPKEFtOdbyRV9JtKx5M=
Original-Received: by 10.14.47.79 with SMTP id s55mr1995834eeb.22.1284312250743;
        Sun, 12 Sep 2010 10:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
Original-Received: from localhost ([85.183.18.158])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a48sm7747043eei.0.2010.09.12.10.24.08
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Sun, 12 Sep 2010 10:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m38w377xux.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's
	message of "Sun, 12 Sep 2010 18:03:34 +0200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--)
List-ID: <ding.gnus.org>
Precedence: bulk
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:70777
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70777>

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no> writes:
>
>>> I'm guessing that for mail splitting purposes, it's never interesting to
>>> work on attachments.
>>
>> No... but what about people that use the INBOX for "leftover" messages?
>> It's what I did when I used client side splitting (I think... it's been
>> a while...).
>
> I don't quite follow...
>
> If you're splitting from the INBOX, then no messages will be left over,
> normally.  (Unless you have a split rule that says that it shouldn't go
> anywhere, that is.)

Most of my email does indeed stay in the inbox. I just use spam-split
currently  : this moves spam tagged to a spam folder. The rest stays
put.