From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/64402 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Katsumi Yamaoka Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: report-emacs-bug and *mail* buffer. Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:59:27 +0900 Organization: Emacsen advocacy group Message-ID: References: <87mz2pt92d.fsf@lrde.org> <87fy8bsxtp.fsf@lrde.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1173747606 13071 80.91.229.12 (13 Mar 2007 01:00:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 01:00:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org, michael@cadilhac.name, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 13 01:59:58 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HQvMq-0003jb-JT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 01:59:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HQvNY-0007M9-S7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:00:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HQvNN-0007M1-Gm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 21:00:29 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HQvNL-0007Lp-Rm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 21:00:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HQvNL-0007Lm-PU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:00:27 -0500 Original-Received: from orlando.hostforweb.net ([216.246.45.90]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HQvMY-0001zK-Ul; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:59:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [66.225.201.151] (port=46069 helo=mail.jpl.org) by orlando.hostforweb.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HQvMb-0000P2-TG; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:59:42 -0500 X-Hashcash: 1:20:070313:rms@gnu.org::9sCRbFoLFqt2Y+A1:0000001niz X-Hashcash: 1:20:070313:michael@cadilhac.name::xDyGt6XZaW//tGpv:00000000000000000000000000000000000000004hbv X-Hashcash: 1:20:070313:emacs-devel@gnu.org::nRl2MTf9rJkW60w3:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000004RpV X-Hashcash: 1:20:070313:ding@gnus.org::HLYIkvOxJj3SOwRw:00000LPL X-Face: #kKnN,xUnmKia.'[pp`; Omh}odZK)?7wQSl"4o04=EixTF+V[""w~iNbM9ZL+.b*_CxUmFk B#Fu[*?MZZH@IkN:!"\w%I_zt>[$nm7nQosZ<3eu; B:$Q_:p!',P.c0-_Cy[dz4oIpw0ESA^D*1Lw= L&i*6&( User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.95 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:VqlM+m81Dv2IvVI4GkYqpgXb4zE= X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - orlando.hostforweb.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jpl.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67825 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:64402 Archived-At: >>>>> In Miles Bader wrote: > Katsumi Yamaoka writes: >> For CONTINUE, it is hard to me to imagine the situation where I want >> to use an existing *mail* buffer in order to compose a new mail. > I dunno, it seems perfectly reasonable to have a "continue composing > mail" command which would jump to the latest unsent message or whatever. I didn't consider such a situation because I misunderstood that there's no interface for that in Gnus. But now I realized Message may call other mail-user-agent's. >>>>> In Richard Stallman wrote: > We will have to implement them in Gnus if those arguments are > really required, > Please make them work. It does not have to be done right now, > though. I'll do it as much as possible. > although I think it doesn't solve the problem > that `sendmail-user-agent' overrides an existing *mail* buffer. > I am not sure what that means, or whether it is really a problem, > but it is certainly a different issue. If you want to raise it, > please send a bug report about it. That's what Micha=EBl Cadilhac reported in <87fy8bsxtp.fsf@lrde.org>. Or I misunderstood it? Anyway, I'll make an effort to implement SWITCH-FUNCTION and CONTINUE arguments in Gnus. Regards,