Re: nntps and posting.

[Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org>]

>>>>> In <87ac0lrea5.fsf@lrde.org> Michaël Cadilhac wrote:

>> --- nntp.el	05 Feb 2006 14:56:44 +0100	1.31
>> +++ nntp.el	25 Dec 2006 13:48:53 +0100
>> @@ -451,10 +451,11 @@
>>  				wait-for nnheader-callback-function)
>>  	  ;; If nothing to wait for, still remove possibly echo'ed commands.
>>  	  ;; We don't have echos if nntp-open-connection-function
>> -	  ;; is `nntp-open-network-stream', so we skip this in that case.
>> +	  ;; is `nntp-open-network-stream' or `nntp-open-ssl-stream',
>> +	  ;; so we skip this in that cases.
>>  	  (unless (or wait-for
>> -		      (equal nntp-open-connection-function
>> -			     'nntp-open-network-stream))
>> +		      (memq nntp-open-connection-function
>> +			    '(nntp-open-network-stream nntp-open-ssl-stream)))
>>  	    (nntp-accept-response)
>>  	    (save-excursion
>>  	      (set-buffer buffer)
>>
>> Without it, I'm getting stuck after my message is posted (it is,
>> actually).
>>
>> I don't know if the patch makes sense, but can we discuss this bug?

> Second ping :-)

Well, I have no account on nntps servers.  It will be necessary
to verify that this change is harmless for every nntps server.
Can anyone do that?

Regards,