From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/61679 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Katsumi Yamaoka Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general,gmane.mail.mh-e.devel Subject: Re: Gnus 5.10.6 problems with PGP/MIME (test cases) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:58:59 +0900 Organization: Emacsen advocacy group Message-ID: References: <19643.1137028354@juniper.net> <26554.1137393402@juniper.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1137398410 15157 80.91.229.2 (16 Jan 2006 08:00:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 08:00:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+m10210@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Jan 16 09:00:06 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EyPHT-0003kY-LQ for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:00:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1EyPHQ-0001i9-00; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 01:59:56 -0600 Original-Received: from nas01.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.39]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1EyPGi-0001i4-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 01:59:12 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by nas01.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EyPGe-0002iT-JV for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 01:59:12 -0600 Original-Received: from washington.hostforweb.net ([66.225.201.13]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1EyPGd-0005zS-00 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 08:59:07 +0100 Original-Received: from [205.234.185.198] (port=39054 helo=mail.jpl.org) by washington.hostforweb.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1EyPJW-000782-O8; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 02:02:07 -0600 Original-To: mh-e-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Face: #kKnN,xUnmKia.'[pp`;Omh}odZK)?7wQSl"4o04=EixTF+V[""w~iNbM9ZL+.b*_CxUmFk B#Fu[*?MZZH@IkN:!"\w%I_zt>[$nm7nQosZ<3eu;B:$Q_:p!',P.c0-_Cy[dz4oIpw0ESA^D*1Lw= L&i*6&( User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ib86F3awwdHL7GLNV+nNV0PF/FI= X-Hashcash: 1:20:060116:mh-e-devel@lists.sourceforge.net::fA7pwptwR/jMosn3:000000000000000000000000000001Y7e X-Hashcash: 1:20:060116:ding@gnus.org::AN55pUEuoaEr/Bc0:00001K/e X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - washington.hostforweb.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - gnus.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jpl.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:61679 gmane.mail.mh-e.devel:11322 Archived-At: --=-=-= >>>>> In <26554.1137393402@juniper.net> Mark D. Baushke wrote: > Hmmm... > I am not seeing any difference after I patch the > gnus-art.el and mm-uu.el files and byte-compile > them. In fact I don't know how they work with MH-E + Gnus, but I guess they might work differently from Gnus. > The message with the > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed > still shows the various PGP markers: > '-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----', > > '-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----' > > '-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----' > instead of actually recognizing that the message is a > signed text and should be desplayed as: > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > This is a test. > [[End of PGP Signed Part]] > or, after the button has been executed displayed as: > [[PGP Signed Part:Mark D Baushke ]] > This is a test. > [[End of PGP Signed Part]] I verified that the patched Gnus 5.10.6 works (it is Gnus, not MH-E + Gnus). Could you try the following Lisp form in the buffer which visits the first (raw) message? (mm-uu-dissect-text-parts (mm-dissect-buffer nil t)) It is expected that you will see "multipart/signed" in the result. If not, I need to try MH-E + Gnus. > The second message works fine and the third message > also shows no differences before and after the patch. To make sure, I attach ``the first message'' that I use: --=-=-= Content-Type: application/x-gzip Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=1.gz Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 H4sICMBRy0MCAzEAbY9bc5swEIXf9St2/NROC5F8gZTEnWALZGeMaxtyad4E lrEaIzFIpE5/fU3SSfOQnX075+x+J250BdU2vypV6+qmhDuxhWuugBAgXjAc BdiDPsYeynTw3oju41M0gF7Cm0egLkx4a/aPogeX71zfUdrmv0RhA7DCWKjL GiphDC8FmmplhbJO9lyLTj7as/rApbqAYs8bI+y41xqHm0LK3gXsdFNxO94d 9G+xRYmshHMrGiO1CoC4GFFuT1dO9F879K5BR/2/g4PPMUbJ629nTgO4JIOR j11CBj7uez72rnZCFaLWxrpv+MjpZhKx+RJWbAXpnC0jCkmUpiGLXkQ042Yf QDoLCULZXho4LX/p634UD7Obzb/kWwOm2hWDJ+L2XQ8+seXN2UKq9vgZIUnP 6WQd0yN/qKelH66YoSqONmGpD+H1ty+3ecXvs/JOJll0GP7sl+n6B4sHf2br 6W7jJw/IKuO1m3CRjxZtks7XyTavvGg4RuP0uZi+AkZL+hHeX5zTIWcdAgAA --=-=-=--