* K-o (gnus-article-save-part) Shifts buffer
@ 2007-07-16 3:56 reader
2007-07-19 2:01 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: reader @ 2007-07-16 3:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
I'm curious if the behavior I see using gnus-article-save-part is
inteneded.
When I hit K-o on a Mime part I'm offered dialog to save the part but
also point is slammed to the top of the message so of course I loose
track of which part I was saving and which is next. I'm forced to
rescan the message after each save..
Quite obnoxious seeming behavior but I suspect there is a good reason
for it in there somewhere.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: K-o (gnus-article-save-part) Shifts buffer
2007-07-16 3:56 K-o (gnus-article-save-part) Shifts buffer reader
@ 2007-07-19 2:01 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2007-07-19 19:31 ` reader
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Katsumi Yamaoka @ 2007-07-19 2:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: reader; +Cc: ding
>>>>> reader@newsguy.com wrote:
> I'm curious if the behavior I see using gnus-article-save-part is
> inteneded.
> When I hit K-o on a Mime part I'm offered dialog to save the part but
> also point is slammed to the top of the message so of course I loose
> track of which part I was saving and which is next. I'm forced to
> rescan the message after each save..
> Quite obnoxious seeming behavior but I suspect there is a good reason
> for it in there somewhere.
I don't like this behavior. Though, I usually use `o' rather than
`K-o' in the article buffer. It might be why people have never
complained to. I've fixed it in the CVS trunk. Could you try it?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: K-o (gnus-article-save-part) Shifts buffer
2007-07-19 2:01 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
@ 2007-07-19 19:31 ` reader
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: reader @ 2007-07-19 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org> writes:
>> Quite obnoxious seeming behavior but I suspect there is a good reason
>> for it in there somewhere.
>
> I don't like this behavior. Though, I usually use `o' rather than
> `K-o' in the article buffer. It might be why people have never
> complained to. I've fixed it in the CVS trunk. Could you try it?
Thanks... it appears to work as expected now. Point stays where ever
it was left.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-07-19 19:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-16 3:56 K-o (gnus-article-save-part) Shifts buffer reader
2007-07-19 2:01 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2007-07-19 19:31 ` reader
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).