>>>>> Katsumi Yamaoka wrote:

> That byte-compilation doesn't report on harmless things is also
> useful at least for me.  I do `make' with all versions of Emacsen
> that Gnus supports whenever a change has been made in Gnus, and
> check the source code if the byte compiler issues a warning.
> Though no-warning doesn't mean there's no problem of course, it
> is useful for such a work.  Is it acceptable to do things to
> suppress warnings at lpath,el and dgnushack.el?

I've added the following function and bound some variable and
function symbols for XEmacs of the version with which it returns
non-nil in dgnushack.el.