Inactive groups got unshown by `l'

Inactive groups got unshown by `l'

[Katsumi Yamaoka]

Hi,

I use the group level 1, 2 and 3 for the mail groups, the interesting
nntp groups, and the other nntp groups respectively.  Furthermore,
I use the level 4 for some foreign groups that take time to open.
I usually start Gnus as `C-u 2 M-x gnus', i.e., I usually read only
the mail groups and some news groups.  But when I want to read one
of the level 4 groups, I used to type `l' in the group buffer and
find it.  Now it doesn't work although the level is less than
`gnus-group-default-list-level'.  The server for those groups is not
shown in the server buffer.  I can use `L' instead of `l', or
the following advice.  But it's a bit inconvenient for me. :<

(defadvice gnus-group-prepare-flat (before list-all-groups activate)
  "Force list all groups."
  (unless (ad-get-arg 1)
    (ad-set-arg
     1
     (lambda (info)
       (<= (gnus-info-level info) (ad-get-arg 0))))))

Re: Inactive groups got unshown by `l'

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org> writes:

> I use the group level 1, 2 and 3 for the mail groups, the interesting
> nntp groups, and the other nntp groups respectively.  Furthermore,
> I use the level 4 for some foreign groups that take time to open.
> I usually start Gnus as `C-u 2 M-x gnus', i.e., I usually read only
> the mail groups and some news groups.  But when I want to read one
> of the level 4 groups, I used to type `l' in the group buffer and
> find it.  Now it doesn't work although the level is less than
> `gnus-group-default-list-level'.  The server for those groups is not
> shown in the server buffer.  I can use `L' instead of `l', or
> the following advice.  But it's a bit inconvenient for me. :<

Yes.  I've now changed the `g' function to use the explicit level for
foreign groups, too, so that `4 g' should work as advertised.

However, I'm not quite sure that I'm totally seeing what you're seeing.
The `l' command hasn't been changed at all, lately, I think, so there
must be some kind of subtle interaction between `l' and `g' that I'm not
quite handling right now...

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen

Re: Inactive groups got unshown by `l'

[Katsumi Yamaoka]

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org> writes:

>> I use the group level 1, 2 and 3 for the mail groups, the interesting
>> nntp groups, and the other nntp groups respectively.  Furthermore,
>> I use the level 4 for some foreign groups that take time to open.
>> I usually start Gnus as `C-u 2 M-x gnus', i.e., I usually read only
>> the mail groups and some news groups.  But when I want to read one
>> of the level 4 groups, I used to type `l' in the group buffer and
>> find it.  Now it doesn't work although the level is less than
>> `gnus-group-default-list-level'.  The server for those groups is not
>> shown in the server buffer.  I can use `L' instead of `l', or
>> the following advice.  But it's a bit inconvenient for me. :<

I got to think I may want to change the lifestyle in Gnus after
all. ;-)

> Yes.  I've now changed the `g' function to use the explicit level for
> foreign groups, too,

By the change, Gnus got to show many native groups having no unread
article even though `gnus-permanently-visible-groups' doesn't match
those groups.  I think it should be fixed (or reverted?).  OTOH, `l'
still doesn't show inactive foreign groups (i.e., groups of which
the server have never been opened).

> so that `4 g' should work as advertised.

As for me that takes a long time because it updates all the level 4
groups and also the level 1, 2, 3 groups (= mostly all the groups).
Instead... the old behavior for years was that `l' shows inactive
groups with `*' (not a number) as the number of articles.  And I
was able to update only some groups one by one using `M-g'
(gnus-group-get-new-news-this-group).

> However, I'm not quite sure that I'm totally seeing what you're seeing.
> The `l' command hasn't been changed at all, lately, I think, so there
> must be some kind of subtle interaction between `l' and `g' that I'm not
> quite handling right now...

I haven't yet investigated what changed the behavior.  But which
do you think reasonable?

1. `l' shows only active groups of which the levels are less than
 or equal to `gnus-group-default-list-level'.

2. `l' shows active and inactive groups of which the levels are
 less than or equal to `gnus-group-default-list-level'.

If the former is adopted, only `L' is the means to recall what
inactive groups a user subscribes to are.  A user cannot browse
inactive servers (i.e., servers that have never been opened) to
know what groups are there because they are not listed in the
server buffer.

I can live with `L', though. ;-)

Re: Inactive groups got unshown by `l'

[Katsumi Yamaoka]

Katsumi Yamaoka wrote:
> By the change, Gnus got to show many native groups having no unread
> article even though `gnus-permanently-visible-groups' doesn't match
> those groups.  I think it should be fixed (or reverted?).

Please ignore this part.  It's due to my failure (defadvice to
gnus-group-prepare-flat).  Sorry for the confusion.

Re: Inactive groups got unshown by `l'

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org> writes:

>> By the change, Gnus got to show many native groups having no unread
>> article even though `gnus-permanently-visible-groups' doesn't match
>> those groups.  I think it should be fixed (or reverted?).
>
> Please ignore this part.  It's due to my failure (defadvice to
> gnus-group-prepare-flat).  Sorry for the confusion.

I should read the entire thread before replying.  :-)

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen

Re: Inactive groups got unshown by `l'

[Katsumi Yamaoka]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 952 bytes --]

Katsumi Yamaoka wrote:
[...]
> I haven't yet investigated what changed the behavior.  But which
> do you think reasonable?

> 1. `l' shows only active groups of which the levels are less than
>  or equal to `gnus-group-default-list-level'.

> 2. `l' shows active and inactive groups of which the levels are
>  less than or equal to `gnus-group-default-list-level'.

> If the former is adopted, only `L' is the means to recall what
> inactive groups a user subscribes to are.  A user cannot browse
> inactive servers (i.e., servers that have never been opened) to
> know what groups are there because they are not listed in the
> server buffer.

> I can live with `L', though. ;-)

The patch below seems to achieve `2', that is the previous
behavior that Gnus has been going for years.  When I start Gnus
with the prefix argument 2, the inactive level 4 groups don't
appear in the group buffer, but `l' shows them with `*'s as
numbers of those groups.


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/x-patch, Size: 467 bytes --]

--- gnus-group.el~	2010-09-05 22:46:18 +0000
+++ gnus-group.el	2010-09-07 05:46:35 +0000
@@ -1350,7 +1350,8 @@
 	      group (gnus-info-group info)
 	      params (gnus-info-params info)
 	      newsrc (cdr newsrc)
-	      unread (gnus-group-unread group))
+	      unread (or (gnus-group-unread group)
+			 (not (gnus-server-opened (gnus-group-method group)))))
 	(when not-in-list
 	  (setq not-in-list (delete group not-in-list)))
 	(when (gnus-group-prepare-logic

Re: Inactive groups got unshown by `l'

[Katsumi Yamaoka]

Katsumi Yamaoka wrote:
> Katsumi Yamaoka wrote:
> [...]
>> I haven't yet investigated what changed the behavior.  But which
>> do you think reasonable?

>> 1. `l' shows only active groups of which the levels are less than
>>  or equal to `gnus-group-default-list-level'.

>> 2. `l' shows active and inactive groups of which the levels are
>>  less than or equal to `gnus-group-default-list-level'.

>> If the former is adopted, only `L' is the means to recall what
>> inactive groups a user subscribes to are.  A user cannot browse
>> inactive servers (i.e., servers that have never been opened) to
>> know what groups are there because they are not listed in the
>> server buffer.

>> I can live with `L', though. ;-)

> The patch below seems to achieve `2', that is the previous
> behavior that Gnus has been going for years.  When I start Gnus
> with the prefix argument 2, the inactive level 4 groups don't
> appear in the group buffer, but `l' shows them with `*'s as
> numbers of those groups.

Please ignore it, too.  Sorry.
By the patch, `l' doesn't show groups that have never been read
if the server is opened for the other groups that the server
provides.  (Even if it worked, `gnus-group-method' used in the
patch should have been replaced with `gnus-group-name-to-method'.)
Sigh.

Re: Inactive groups got unshown by `l'

[Katsumi Yamaoka]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1385 bytes --]

Katsumi Yamaoka wrote:
> Katsumi Yamaoka wrote:
>> Katsumi Yamaoka wrote:
>> [...]
>>> I haven't yet investigated what changed the behavior.  But which
>>> do you think reasonable?

>>> 1. `l' shows only active groups of which the levels are less than
>>>  or equal to `gnus-group-default-list-level'.

>>> 2. `l' shows active and inactive groups of which the levels are
>>>  less than or equal to `gnus-group-default-list-level'.

>>> If the former is adopted, only `L' is the means to recall what
>>> inactive groups a user subscribes to are.  A user cannot browse
>>> inactive servers (i.e., servers that have never been opened) to
>>> know what groups are there because they are not listed in the
>>> server buffer.

>>> I can live with `L', though. ;-)

>> The patch below seems to achieve `2', that is the previous
>> behavior that Gnus has been going for years.  When I start Gnus
>> with the prefix argument 2, the inactive level 4 groups don't
>> appear in the group buffer, but `l' shows them with `*'s as
>> numbers of those groups.

> Please ignore it, too.  Sorry.
> By the patch, `l' doesn't show groups that have never been read
> if the server is opened for the other groups that the server
> provides.  (Even if it worked, `gnus-group-method' used in the
> patch should have been replaced with `gnus-group-name-to-method'.)
> Sigh.

This may be the third time lucky:


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/x-patch, Size: 411 bytes --]

--- gnus-group.el~	2010-09-05 22:46:18 +0000
+++ gnus-group.el	2010-09-07 07:03:23 +0000
@@ -1350,7 +1350,7 @@
 	      group (gnus-info-group info)
 	      params (gnus-info-params info)
 	      newsrc (cdr newsrc)
-	      unread (gnus-group-unread group))
+	      unread (or (gnus-group-unread group) t))
 	(when not-in-list
 	  (setq not-in-list (delete group not-in-list)))
 	(when (gnus-group-prepare-logic

Re: Inactive groups got unshown by `l'

[Lawrence Mitchell]

Katsumi Yamaoka wrote:

[...]

> --- gnus-group.el~	2010-09-05 22:46:18 +0000
>>>> gnus-group.el	2010-09-07 07:03:23 +0000
> @@ -1350,7 +1350,7 @@
>  	      group (gnus-info-group info)
>  	      params (gnus-info-params info)
>  	      newsrc (cdr newsrc)
> -	      unread (gnus-group-unread group))
>>	      unread (or (gnus-group-unread group) t))
>  	(when not-in-list
>  	  (setq not-in-list (delete group not-in-list)))
>  	(when (gnus-group-prepare-logic

(or (gnus-group-unread group) t)

AKA

t

Which at least superficially doesn't seem right.

Lawrence

-- 
Lawrence Mitchell <wence@gmx.li>

Re: Inactive groups got unshown by `l'

[Katsumi Yamaoka]

Lawrence Mitchell wrote:
[...]
> (or (gnus-group-unread group) t)
> AKA
> t

Those aren't the same.  `(gnus-group-unread group)' returns a number
or nil.  But

> Which at least superficially doesn't seem right.

I suspect it, too.  I'll look into old Gnus versions.

Re: Inactive groups got unshown by `l'

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org> writes:

> This may be the third time lucky:
> --- gnus-group.el~	2010-09-05 22:46:18 +0000
> +++ gnus-group.el	2010-09-07 07:03:23 +0000
> @@ -1350,7 +1350,7 @@
>  	      group (gnus-info-group info)
>  	      params (gnus-info-params info)
>  	      newsrc (cdr newsrc)
> -	      unread (gnus-group-unread group))
> +	      unread (or (gnus-group-unread group) t))
>  	(when not-in-list
>  	  (setq not-in-list (delete group not-in-list)))
>  	(when (gnus-group-prepare-logic

Yeah, try installing that patch and we'll see what happens.  :-)

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen

Re: Inactive groups got unshown by `l'

[Katsumi Yamaoka]

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org> writes:

>> This may be the third time lucky:
>> --- gnus-group.el~	2010-09-05 22:46:18 +0000
>> +++ gnus-group.el	2010-09-07 07:03:23 +0000
>> @@ -1350,7 +1350,7 @@
>>  	      group (gnus-info-group info)
>>  	      params (gnus-info-params info)
>>  	      newsrc (cdr newsrc)
>> -	      unread (gnus-group-unread group))
>> +	      unread (or (gnus-group-unread group) t))
>>  	(when not-in-list
>>  	  (setq not-in-list (delete group not-in-list)))
>>  	(when (gnus-group-prepare-logic

> Yeah, try installing that patch and we'll see what happens.  :-)

Thanks.  I'm going to try it, or similar but better one if any,
later (now I'm not in a usual place).

Re: Inactive groups got unshown by `l'

[Katsumi Yamaoka]

Katsumi Yamaoka wrote:
> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote:
>> Yeah, try installing that patch and we'll see what happens.  :-)

> Thanks.  I'm going to try it, or similar but better one if any,
> later (now I'm not in a usual place).

I found out the cause of `l' not listing inactive groups at last.
This was made in `gnus-get-unread-articles' by the changes:

       via  7cce28b2d41e11d65102b8910ee9efc361b720ca (commit)
       via  bae6dd8488ad8f6e7edacba9cce916ab73f8abf9 (commit)
       via  cbb6b60d34cf32d84fc608cb96c22f6334ae6515 (commit)
      from  b40f6569ce2ef62e8a5716cb9ec56cf8de25f195 (commit)

Cf. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.cvs/9936

The old version of `gnus-get-unread-articles' set the number of
unread articles of inactive groups to t as follows:

-	;; The group couldn't be reached, so we nix out the number of
-	;; unread articles and stuff.
-	(gnus-set-active group nil)
-	(let ((tmp (gnus-group-entry group)))
-	  (when tmp
-	    (setcar tmp t))))))

So, previously when I started Gnus with the argument 2, it marked
the level 3~5 groups with t, and `gnus-group-prepare-flat' didn't
ignore those inactive groups when the `l' command was invoked.
However, the present code doesn't do it, therefore the form
`(gnus-group-unread "method+inactive_server:a_group")', that
`gnus-group-prepare-flat' runs, always returns nil.  I've added
a similar code to `gnus-get-unread-articles'.

Re: Inactive groups got unshown by `l'

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org> writes:

> However, the present code doesn't do it, therefore the form
> `(gnus-group-unread "method+inactive_server:a_group")', that
> `gnus-group-prepare-flat' runs, always returns nil.  I've added
> a similar code to `gnus-get-unread-articles'.

Great!

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen

Re: Inactive groups got unshown by `l'

[Katsumi Yamaoka]

Robert Pluim wrote:
[...]
> Loading cus-dep...

> xemacs exiting.
> Cannot open load file: "advice"make[1]: *** [gnus-load.el] Error 255
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Documents and Settings/RPluim/.xemacs/gnus/lisp'
> make: *** [lick] Error 2

I've introduced defadvice to directory-files in order to exclude
the lisp/.dir-locals.el file.  So, I may be the culprit, though
I have no such problem in building the latest Gnus with XEmacs.
I'll look into it further...

Re: Inactive groups got unshown by `l'

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org> writes:

> By the change, Gnus got to show many native groups having no unread
> article even though `gnus-permanently-visible-groups' doesn't match
> those groups.

Hm...  I don't see that...

> I haven't yet investigated what changed the behavior.  But which
> do you think reasonable?
>
> 1. `l' shows only active groups of which the levels are less than
>  or equal to `gnus-group-default-list-level'.
>
> 2. `l' shows active and inactive groups of which the levels are
>  less than or equal to `gnus-group-default-list-level'.

I think 2) is how it's supposed to work.  It's what I was aiming for,
anyway.  :-)

I'll try restarting Emacs to check whether I have any artifacts going
on...

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen